Bibliography, September 2025

BOTM: R. Guha, India after Gandhi (2017)

A. Foulds, The quickening maze (2008)
E.J. Howard, The light years (1990)
---------------, Marking time (1991)
---------------, Confusion (1993)
---------------, Casting off (1995)
---------------, All change (2013)
A. Krebiehl, Wine of Germany (2019)
R. Perlstein, Nixonland (2008)
A. Seldon, Major: a political life (1997)
F. Wade, Square haunting (2020)

I am glad that I've now read Elizabeth Howard's Cazalet saga. I thought they were very much worth reading, though I don't think any were outstanding. #1 and #4 were the best. I did wonder if one of them deserved it, but in the end felt that Guha's book was the best. It's obviously an impossible task to cover seventy years of Indian history even in a very long book, but he does a good job or marshalling the narrative. As ever with these things, the back end is harder to do and it is worse than the front. It very much helped me to understand Indian modern history, particularly to distinguish the bits that were inherited and the parts that were changed after independence. Very helpful on Kashmir too. I hesitate to recommend it because it is so long, but the best of September's reading.

Bibliography, August 2025

BOTM: Tan Twan Eng, The house of doors (2023)

M. Albertus, Land Power (2007)

P. Barker, The silence of the girls (2018)
--------,    The women of Troy (2021)

--------,    The voyage home (2024)
J. Barnes, Flaubert's Parrot (1984)*

H. Chang, Bad Samaritans (2007)

J.M. Coetzee, Summertime (2009)

Y. Kawabata, Thousand Cranes (1952)

J. Lees-Milne, The last Stuarts (1983)

R. Perlstein, Before the Storm (2001)

G. Redmonds, Christian names in local and family history (2004)

J. Thurber, The 13 clocks (1950)

Great holiday month; I read loads of things, and some of them were really really long. And, with the exception of Land Power, I think they were all good. My favourites were Barnes, Perlstein, Chang and Eng. Barnes is dismissed as lightweight, which I don't think it is at all, just very finely balanced (I loved it just as much the second time round). Perlstein was fascinating. Key conclusion: America has always been nuts; and racist. Chang was fantastic, though I think less interesting to read now, 18 years later, because some of that thinking has become mainstream, particularly post crash. I do have quite serious regret that I didn't do more economic history as an undergraduate. 

Best of the lot was Tan Twan Eng's book on Maugham, which I thought was outstanding. I do really like Maugham, so I am biased around books that cover him, but this was a splendid sideways access onto a fragment of his life, and that of those strange eastern imperial Englanders. It's better than his excellent prior novel, and I'm going to seek out his other one too.

Bibliography, July 2025

BOTM: T. Chivers, Everything is predictable: how Bayesian statistics explain our world (2023)

C. Adiche, Purple Hibiscus (2003)
C. Adiche, Half of a yellow sun (2006)
A. Byatt, Ragnarok (2011)
A. Bashford, The Huxleys (2022)
M. Bahari, Then they came for me (2013)
J.M. Coetzee, Youth (2002)
J. Goethe, The Sorrows of Young Werther (1774)
M. Grant, Gone (2008)

I loved Chivers' book on Bayes. I regret not doing more statistics beyond 18. In a minor key, I'd have been well placed to do a paper on historical statistics in my first year at university; more majorly, I do wonder if I should have done economic history more generally. There aren't many status in first millenium. Sadly. Anyway, had I done so, I hope I would have been part of the debates and communities he describes. It's done very well (though I think could be slightly shorter) and it has songs!

It's a good job it did have songs. Half of a Yellow Sun is an outstanding book. Everyone says so; they're right. It was very close.

Bibliography, June 2025

BOTM: P. Morris, Black Butterflies (2023)

L. Baston, Borderlines: A history of Europe told from the edges (2024)
A. Berkeley, Malice Aforethought (1931)
J. Elledge, A Brief History of the World in 47 Borders (2024)
B. Ehrman, Heaven and Hell: A History of the afterlife (2020)
J. Haidt, The anxious generation (2025)
S. Harvey, The Western wind (2018)

B. Malone, Country Music USA (5th edition, 2018)
N. Nicholson, Portrait of a marriage (1940)

B. Unsworth, The quality of mercy (2011)

J. Vinge, The snow queen (1980)

D. Wright, Breaking Bread (2025)

If I was just judging books on their first parts, then this would be a straight clash between Ehrman and Malone. I thought the early history of country music and the early (read: Jewish) history of the afterlife, was absolutely fascinating. They did not sustain their excellence, with Malone in particular really falling off and losing focus. I often find this with music history. By the 1970s, it just gets too fragmented. Several decent novels Iles (pen name for Anthony Berkeley), Morris, Vinge all very good. Morris the best, though I thought some part were naively done, especially about religion. It was powerful though (it's the story of the siege of Sarajevo). By a whisker though, I would put it ahead of Baston's book . I read that in a pair with Elledge, and it is by far the better book. My main dilemma is whether it's really history or travelogue, but I decided it was history, and a very good vignette-led history it is.

Bibliography, May 2025

BOTM: A. Patchett, Those precious days (2021)

L. Baston, Borderlines: a history of Europe in 29 borders (2024)
C. Brenchley, Mary Ellen, Craterean! (2024)
L. Booth, (ed.), Wisden cricketers Almanack (2025)
R. Gaafar, A mouth full of salt (2024)
R. Heinlein, The moon is a harsh mistress (1966)
H. Kashiwai, Restaurant of lost recipes (2024)
S. Mawer, The glass room (2009)
A. Patchett, Truth and Beauty (2004)
A. Petersen, On the edge of the dark sea of darkness (2008)

A. Sen, Home in the world (2021)

One of A's many virtues is that she can pick out superb books for me. A few years ago, she found Chaz Brenchley's amazing fusion of pre-golden age science fiction (in this case Imperial Mars) and school stories for girls (in this case, especially the Chalet School). They're a marvel. This is the third and they remain wonderful.

It does, mean, horrifically, that even the old feeling books were modern. Thankfully, at read some actual golden age science fiction to keep at least one thing before 2000 (even if seven were in the 2020s). As well as being modern, a lot of the other readings were deeply frustrating books. They weren't bad (apart from Petersen), but they could have been so much better. In particular, I thought Gaafar struggled for resolution, Sen for narrative drive, and Baston for consistency, while Mawer wrote an excellent 200 pages before really tailing off in the second half. On balance, I am glad I read them all though.

No balance needed for my favourite. Having completed all of Ann Patchett's novels this year, I've knocked off the memoirs now. Those precious days is her COVID memoir and it's beautiful. All the things you expect of her writing. I think I've read everything of her's now. This is right up there.

Bibliography, April 2025

BOTM: R. Caro, The years of Lyndon Johnson: master of the senate (2003)

R. H. Benson, Lord of the world (1908)

R. Caro, The years of Lyndon Johnson: the passage of power (2012)
W. Dalrymple and A. Anand, Kohinoor: the story of the world's most infamous diamond (2020)
N. Duerden, Exit stage left: the curious afterlife of pop stars (2022)
J. Meades, The plagiarist in the kitchen (2018)
N. Novik, His Majesty's dragon (2006)
M.S. Pillai, Rebel sultans: the Deccan from Khilji to Shivaji (2018)
R. Skloot, The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks (2010)

R. Zelazny, A night in lonesome October (1994)

A lot of these were mediocre. Duerden, Novik, Dalrymple, and Benson were all actively bad, with flashes of quality or information in some places. I did enjoy Meades and Zelazny, though I suspect I didn't have as much fun as they did writing and conceiving them (Zelazny's book is written from the perspective of Jack the Ripper's dog).

On the other hand, I am definitely glad I was reading rather than researching Caro's volumes 3 and 4. Volume 3, on Johnson's senate career, is the best of the lot, and is as much a history of the mid century senate as it is of Johnson. As a result, it is a thousand pages long. It's an astonishing book, that penetrates a world that seems unimaginable, yet was vital, and is engrossing about the tactics and practicalities of power. It's a marvel.

Bibliography, March 2023

BOTM: R. Caro, The years of Lyndon Johnson: the path to power (1982)

R. Caro, The years of Lyndon Johnson: the means of ascent (1990)
A. Patchett, The patron saint of liars (1992)
--------, Taft (1994)
--------, The magician's apprentice (1997)
--------, Tom Lake (2019)
E. Wald, Dylan goes electric! (2015)

I'm deliberately reading a lot about America this year, and this month is, accidentally, entirely American - and deeply homogenous. I'm delighted that I've now read all of Patchett's novels and have always thought she was great. Of these, I liked The magician's apprentice the best. It's a curious idea for a novel, but lives are curious and it was expertly, softly, done. My completist nature is even more excited by the prospect of addressing Caro's Lyndon four volume (to date) Johnson biography. I've been thinking about it for years, but kept putting it off because of it's massive length. I regret that. It's a masterpiece. I read the first two volumes in March and they're both compelling, but the first is the better (I think the second is the weakest of the four). It is obviously too long, he's not born for the first fifty odd pages, but the length and the detail is the point. It's an immersion in a world and the nuances of that world aren't obvious to us without that detail. Two standout moments for me:

• Firstly, the chapter on Johnson bringing electricity to the Hill Country of Texas is a truly astonishing piece of writing, which drops an astounding evocation from social history into a biography, and makes you realise the power of politics to change things
• Second, a vignette from the end, when Johnson loses his first senate campaign because although he stole votes, his opponent's backers stole more. Hearing this news, FDR talks about his own vote stealing. We forget how short the distance is to voting working like that in the US.

Anyway, it told me lots about America, lots about Lyndon Johnson, and lots about what I like in politicians (not what I look for in friends). I wish I'd read it sooner.